Your shipment scenario
Seven questions. The recommendation updates as you change answers.
Decision tool for the 11 official ICC Incoterms 2020 rules. Tell us the mode, countries and who pays for what — get the recommended rule with risk transfer point and a 11-line cost-split.
Seven questions. The recommendation updates as you change answers.
Carriage and Insurance Paid To
When goods are handed over to the first carrier — seller pays freight AND insurance to destination, but risk transfers at origin.
International shipments where the buyer wants 'all-risks' insurance baked in (default cover under CIP 2020 is ICC A — all-risks).
Bundles freight + insurance margin; buyer typically prefers it.
Receives a cargo policy assignable to them on transit risk.
| Cost line | Responsible party |
|---|---|
| Export packing | Seller |
| Loading at seller premises | Seller |
| Pre-carriage inland to export point | Seller |
| Export clearance | Seller |
| Main carriage (sea / air / truck) | Seller |
| Cargo insurance | Seller |
| Unloading at destination terminal | Buyer |
| Import clearance | Buyer |
| Import duties + taxes | Buyer |
| On-carriage inland to buyer | Buyer |
| Unloading at buyer premises | Buyer |
Cost, Insurance and Freight
When goods are loaded on board the vessel at the port of shipment. Seller pays freight AND insurance to destination port.
Bulk maritime trade (e.g. commodities) where minimum cover insurance (ICC C) is acceptable to the buyer.
Captures freight + insurance margin; risk released early.
Receives a marine cargo policy assignable to them on transit risk.
| Cost line | Responsible party |
|---|---|
| Export packing | Seller |
| Loading at seller premises | Seller |
| Pre-carriage inland to export point | Seller |
| Export clearance | Seller |
| Main carriage (sea / air / truck) | Seller |
| Cargo insurance | Seller |
| Unloading at destination terminal | Buyer |
| Import clearance | Buyer |
| Import duties + taxes | Buyer |
| On-carriage inland to buyer | Buyer |
| Unloading at buyer premises | Buyer |
The 11 Incoterms 2020 rules are encoded from ICC Publication 723E — in force since January 1, 2020 and still the current edition as of our last dataset review on 2026-06-09 — as a static obligations matrix. Your seven answers are scored against every rule: transport-mode compatibility first (FAS, FOB, CFR and CIF are sea and inland-waterway only, so they are disqualified outright for air, road or rail), then who pays the main carriage, who clears export, who clears import — the single most discriminating answer, since only DDP places import clearance and duty on the seller — and finally the insurance preference. The highest score wins, and the runner-up is shown whenever it lands within 25 points, so you can compare the trade-off instead of taking one answer on faith.
With mode = sea, seller in CN, buyer in US, seller paying the main carriage and insurance, and the buyer clearing import, the tool recommends CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To) with CIF as runner-up. Both bundle freight and insurance into the seller's price, but the dataset encodes two real differences: CIP's default insurance cover is ICC Clauses A (all-risks) — raised from minimum cover by the 2020 revision — while CIF still defaults to minimum-cover ICC Clauses C; and CIP works for any transport mode, whereas CIF is restricted to sea and inland waterway. For containerised sea cargo the scoring also applies a small penalty to the maritime-only family, which is why CIP edges out CIF here.
Pick multimodal transport with the seller paying freight and handling both export and import clearance and the verdict is DDP (Delivered Duty Paid). DDP is the only rule of the 11 where the seller clears import and pays import duties and taxes; in the cost-split table, 10 of the 11 cost lines sit with the seller — only unloading at the buyer's premises stays with the buyer. The caution shown next to the verdict is not boilerplate: DDP makes the seller responsible for import VAT and customs formalities in the buyer's country, which is usually only workable with a local tax registration or a fiscal representative.
With mode = sea, the buyer paying the main carriage and arranging their own insurance, and the seller clearing export only, the tool recommends FCA (Free Carrier) with FOB (Free on Board) as runner-up. The two rules assign all 11 cost lines identically — seller covers export packing, origin loading, pre-carriage and export clearance; buyer pays everything from the main carriage onwards. The difference is the risk transfer point: FOB transfers risk when goods are loaded on board the vessel, FCA when goods are handed to the buyer's nominated carrier. Containers are handed over at terminal yards days before vessel loading, which is why the ICC recommends FCA over FOB for containerised cargo — and why the scoring carries an 8-point penalty on the sea-only family.
Both make the seller pay freight and insurance to destination while risk transfers at origin, but they differ on three points from ICC Publication 723E (in force since January 1, 2020). First, scope: CIF only applies to sea and inland-waterway transport, CIP to any mode including multimodal container moves. Second, insurance level: the 2020 revision raised CIP's default cover to ICC Clauses A (all-risks), while CIF kept minimum-cover ICC Clauses C — a deliberate split, because CIF is used heavily in commodity bulk trades where minimum cover is market practice. Third, risk transfer: under CIF risk passes when goods are on board the vessel; under CIP it passes when goods are handed to the first carrier, which can be a trucker at the seller's door. For containerised or high-value cargo, CIP with its all-risks default is usually the better fit. Dataset last verified 2026-06-09.
You can write FOB into a contract for containers, but the ICC explicitly recommends FCA instead, and this tool's scoring follows that guidance. The problem is a risk gap: FOB transfers risk when goods are loaded on board the vessel, yet containers are handed over at the terminal yard days earlier. Between gate-in and vessel loading the cargo sits at the seller's risk under FOB even though it is already out of the seller's control. FCA closes that gap by transferring risk at the handover to the buyer's nominated carrier. FCA 2020 also added an optional on-board bill of lading mechanism for letter-of-credit financing, removing the historical reason exporters clung to FOB.
Under DAP and DPU the buyer handles import clearance and pays import duties and taxes — the seller delivers to the named destination but stops short of customs. Under DDP the seller does it all: import clearance, duties and taxes are all seller cost lines in the ICC obligations matrix, making DDP the only one of the 11 rules with that allocation. That is also DDP's trap: paying import VAT in the buyer's country often requires the seller to register for tax there or appoint a fiscal representative, so DDP is best reserved for sellers with an existing footprint in the destination market.
One word: unloading. Under DAP (Delivered at Place) the seller delivers goods ready for unloading on the arriving transport, and the buyer unloads at their own cost and risk. Under DPU (Delivered at Place Unloaded) the seller must also unload — it is the only Incoterm 2020 rule that obliges the seller to unload at destination. Pick DPU only when the seller genuinely controls unloading equipment at the named place (a terminal, warehouse or yard); if the seller cannot guarantee that, ICC guidance is to stay with DAP.
Under EXW the seller only makes goods available at their premises — not even loaded — and the buyer becomes responsible for export clearance in a country where they are usually not resident. Many customs regimes expect the exporter of record to be established locally, so a foreign buyer can struggle to file the export declaration, obtain licences or produce proof of export for the seller's VAT zero-rating. ICC guidance since the 2020 edition is to use FCA for international pickups: the seller clears export and risk still transfers at origin. This tool encodes that guidance as a scoring penalty on cross-border EXW scenarios.
Yes — Incoterms editions do not expire. If your contract explicitly says "FOB Incoterms 2010", the 2010 text governs. Incoterms 2020 (ICC Publication 723E) has been the current edition since January 1, 2020, and as of our last dataset review on 2026-06-09 the ICC has not published a successor edition. New contracts should reference Incoterms 2020 explicitly, including the edition year and the named place or port — the main 2010→2020 changes were DAT becoming DPU, the CIP insurance default rising to ICC Clauses A, and the FCA on-board bill of lading option.
No. Incoterms 2020 allocates risk of loss or damage, cost responsibility, and tasks such as customs clearance and insurance between seller and buyer — it deliberately does not govern transfer of title, payment terms, remedies for breach, or what happens if the goods are defective. Those belong in the sales contract and its governing law. A shipment can be at the buyer's risk under CPT while the seller still owns the goods through a retention-of-title clause. Treat the Incoterm as the logistics and risk layer of the contract, not as the whole contract.
Answers reflect the ICC Incoterms 2020 rules (Publication 723E, in force since January 1, 2020), as encoded in this tool's dataset — last verified against the ICC publication on 2026-06-09.
This recommendation is informational only and based on the ICC Incoterms 2020 rules (Publication 723E). Incoterms is a registered trademark of the International Chamber of Commerce. Always confirm the chosen rule with your freight forwarder, customs broker and the named place or port. It is not legal or customs advice.
The 11 Incoterms 2020 rules are encoded from ICC Publication 723E as a static dataset: per rule, the risk transfer point, the A1–A10 / B1–B10 cost-obligation split, the permitted transport modes, and the insurance obligations (CIF / CIP). Your seven answers are scored against that matrix — mode compatibility first (FAS / FOB / CFR / CIF are sea-only), then who pays the main carriage, who clears export and import, and the insurance preference. The highest-scoring rule is recommended; the runner-up is shown with its own reasoning so you can compare.
The dataset is versioned and re-verified against the ICC publication on each review (2026-06-09 last). The tool does not fetch live data, does not estimate prices, and does not replace the named place or port you must still agree in the contract.
Dataset last verified: 2026-06-09
Settling the Incoterm is rarely the last decision in a shipment. These tools cover the cost lines that follow: